Facebook Twitter

Donate to BlackPast Blog
  • African American History
  • African American History in the West
  • Global African History
  • Perspectives

NOTE: will not disclose, use, give or sell any of the requested information to third parties.

3 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Rock the Vote

NAAAS & Affiliates 27th Joint National Conference

Shop Amazon and help in the Classroom

Scottsboro Case (1931-1950)

Image Ownership: Public Domain
On March 25, 1931, nine African Americans ranging in age from thirteen to twenty-one were arrested for allegedly raping two white women on board a train near Paint Rock, Alabama. An all-white jury quickly convicted the defendants on flimsy evidence and eight of the nine were sentenced to death. The case might have become another forgotten chapter in the long history of southern legal violence against African Americans were it not for the efforts of the American Communist Party (CP), which recognized the young men’s experiences with the legal system as an opportunity to expose southern racism and strengthen the Party's appeal among black Americans.

The CP's legal auxiliary, the International Labor Defense (ILD), engaged in a protracted battle for control over the case with the NAACP, which painted the ILD as opportunistically using the defendants to promote its political ideology. After wresting control of the case, the ILD won a new trial, which took place in March 1933. At this trial, Ruby Bates, one the two female accusers, recanted her charge and testified for the defense. Despite Bates's testimony, the defendants were convicted again and sentenced to death. Later that year, however, a circuit court judge overturned the decision and ordered a third trial. At this point, the ILD and NAACP agreed to a coalition defense, the Scottsboro Defense Committee (SDC), which also included the ACLU and the American Scottsboro Committee. Convicted again in 1936, the SDC agreed to a plea bargain that freed four defendants and commuted the death sentences of the remaining five to lengthy prison terms. Despite several notorious legal blunders, including an attempt to bribe the other accuser, the ILD's legal defense saved the defendants from execution and helped establish important legal precedents, including a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Norris v. Alabama, which paved the way for the integration of jury rolls around the nation.

Predicated on the belief that justice was not attainable through courtroom action alone, the ILD adopted a strategy that combined legal appeals with sustained political protest and media offensives. Through marches, speeches, songs, novels, poems, and a variety of other initiatives, the ILD helped turn "Scottsboro" into an international cause celebre and a potent cultural symbol for American racism and southern injustice. The Scottsboro case also helped solidify an alliance between white radicals and African Americans that would become a crucial component of the black freedom struggle in succeeding years.

Dan T. Carter, Scottsboro: A Tragedy of the American South (Baton Rouge:  Louisiana State University Press, 1979); James Goodman, Stories of Scottsboro (New York:  Pantheon Books, 1994); Robin D.G. Kelley, "Scottsboro Case," in Mary Jo Buhle, Paul Buhle, and Dan Geogakas, eds. Encyclopedia of the American Left (New York:  Garland Publishing, 1990), 684-686.


University of Washington

Entry Categories:

Copyright 2007-2017 - v3.0 NDCHost - California | | Your donations help us to grow. | We welcome your suggestions. | Mission Statement is an independent non-profit corporation 501(c)(3). It has no affiliation with the University of Washington. is supported in part by a grant from Humanities Washington, a state-wide non-profit organization supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the state of Washington, and contributions from individuals and foundations.