Facebook Twitter

Donate to BlackPast Blog
  • African American History
  • African American History in the West
  • Global African History
  • Perspectives

NOTE: will not disclose, use, give or sell any of the requested information to third parties.

7 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Rock the Vote

NAAAS & Affiliates 27th Joint National Conference

Shop Amazon and help in the Classroom

Holmes v. Ford (1853)

Image Ownership: Public Domain
The lawsuit filed by Robin and Polly Holmes against Nathaniel Ford in 1852 is often cited as the legal event that ended slavery in Oregon. This is not accurate. Legally, Oregon was anti-slavery throughout the antebellum period. The provisional government prohibited slavery in 1843; the territorial government did so in 1848. Finally, Oregonians included an anti-slavery article in the 1857 statehood constitution. The Holmes v. Ford case represented one battlefield in a long simmering conflict over slavery in Oregon.

Nathaniel Ford had acquired the Holmes family as slaves while sheriff of Howard County, Missouri in 1841. According to Holmes’s court filing, Ford promised to grant freedom to the family if they helped him open a farm in Oregon in 1844. Ford’s counter filing denied such an agreement. Once in Oregon, Ford continued to hold the family until 1849.

According to Ford, Holmes agreed to work for Ford’s son in the California gold fields in 1849 and upon his return was set free with his wife Polly and infant son. Ford further claimed that Holmes agreed to leave his other three children with Ford as “wards” to compensate for his support of the family in previous years. Holmes denied any such agreement and claimed Ford held his children as slaves and planned to sell them in Missouri under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Publication in 1930 of a Ford letter confirmed this to be true.

Chief Justice George Williams of the Oregon Territorial Supreme Court heard the case on July 13, 1853 and shortly thereafter awarded the children to their parents. His ruling never mentioned slavery. Oregon’s anti-slavery prohibitions should not be misconstrued as sympathy for blacks. There was a simultaneous effort to legally exclude all blacks, slave or free, from the area and to create a free soil white homeland in Oregon.

Scott McArthur, “The Polk County Slave Case,” Historically Speaking A Periodic Publication of the Polk County, Oregon, Historical Society Volume II (August, 1970): 1-10; Fred Lockley, “The Case of Robin Holmes vs. Nathaniel Ford,” Oregon Historical Quarterly Volume XXIII (March 1922 – December 1922): 111-137.


Portland State University

Entry Categories:

Copyright 2007-2017 - v3.0 NDCHost - California | | Your donations help us to grow. | We welcome your suggestions. | Mission Statement is an independent non-profit corporation 501(c)(3). It has no affiliation with the University of Washington. is supported in part by a grant from Humanities Washington, a state-wide non-profit organization supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the state of Washington, and contributions from individuals and foundations.